Globalization | Ahmad Hussein Annan

The World in the US Elections

Democrats »						Republicans »

12 july 2008
The latest in the Battle
The difference between McCain and Obama reflectS the difference between blind Idealism and empirical Realism. Mr. McCain believes: that victory in Iraq must be based on conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables," he said. "Unlike Barack Obama, that position will not change based on politics or the demands of the New York Times."Militarily; Leaders operate in according to the Situation on the Ground, and politicians base their Decisions on the general political and strategic Stance. So there are no independent Time Tables in the World of Politics and Strategy. In his Banana Campaign, Mr. Obama advocates a rush Withdrawal. But to take such a step, a Leader would have to listen to the Intelligence Reports, and consult every related Institution on whether a decision be mad or not. In fact; Obama and his Campaigners play Populism trying to exploit the shocked instead of enlightening them (which is their Job as politicians also).

11.06.2008

Ghaddafi criticize Obama because of his Support to Israel. after he pulled Clinton out of the Race, Obama changed the dialect, and fired some contradictive Satements.

Mr.Obama(the democratic Candidate) seems to be arbitrary in his contest Strategy. On the Beginning Obama promised to talk to Adversaries... But in his Aipac Speech he promised to isolate Hamas untill the Party recongnize Israel

06.04.2008
Why should Clinton give up?
Barack Obama has won the hearts and Minds of the left US Voters. The man promises the US Poor slums a Health and Job paradise.
visit K to know more

24.03.2008

Obama Republic seems to be a anti-globalization Movement, when he promises to put an End for Jobs oversee, and a restriction for the Investments to run within a national framework!!!!

20.03. 2008

On his Visit to Israel Mr. MCcain supported the Israeli Claim to Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel ( a claim that has been rejected by the international Community).
(Details at: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/080319/usa/mideast_diplomacy_us_mccain
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/965777.html )
Israel annexed Arab east Jerusalem after the 1967 Middle East war and declared it part of its eternal undivided capital.
What are the possible fundaments, on which our republican Man based his Support?
Despite his great understading of Lieralism, the Man remains a tenderfoot, with small Middle East Experiences and Understanding.
His Support is contradictory to the Security Resolutions ( 181 , 194 , 338, 242 etc).

09.03.2008
After his defeat in Ohio and Texas,Mr. Obama keeps promising that he will offer a health Insurance to every single American. Which is politically impossible. In almost all faire States world Wide, no Government could achieve what Mr. Obama has bee promising, leaving a bad impact upon the traditional Nomination Campaign. Many Crazy Americans have been catching at his Hopeless African health and withdraw Bananas.

29.02.2008

Mr. Obama keeps promising that he will meet Adversaries and Dictators, which would lead him to rule in same way his Race was historically subjected to. An anti-abolitionist on the international Stage!!

05.01.2008

I always wondered why do the Arabs follow and watch the US Elections Carefully!!!

The Rallies and first election Results in IOWA have been the response to many Questions. Romney, who gained the second largest amount of the republican Votes use to be a sincere Follower of Mormonism, a Church that preach a new Gospel considering the old one a mere false Doctrines. The Church is very loyal to Israel and the Mormons believe that; in order to be a good and brave Christian, you have to pay 10% of your entire income as a Tribute to Israel… Good Sons…. But Romney play the good American Boy in his Campaigns, claiming to make distinction between his religion and his political activities which are supposed to be based on the US liberal Doctrines. During his Orations, he could not solve the dispute between becoming a loyal American and follow a pro Israeli Church, in which the Israeli enjoy a higher Priority than a usual American, which means; that the IOWA Voters need to be well informed about Mr.Romney Tenet. The CNN Analysis about Romney were critical and far from being enough to create a well informed public ( which is in according to Jefferson a very important Basis for a liberal Democracy).

The rise of Barak Obama on the democratic Level shows ; that the Iowans are neither Racists nor bear fundamental Enmity against the Muslims. The Man is black, and believed to have been branched from an Islamic pedigree. But his rise among other Democrats affirm the democratic commitment to Protectionism and health insurance, welfare state and progressivism, end of the War in Iraq and a return home, homosexuality and Gay Marriage ( distanced from Abolition). That is not an easy and prosperous plan from republican point of view . Huckabee seems to have taken a middle position on the mentioned points (although he rely to some extent on the christian Tradition). Based on Hegel, we may include a Synthesis resulted inferently from the a democrato- republican Dualism, imposed by the War on Iraq.

The best and most informed and moderate (although lowly caucused) Candidate from an Arabic point of view is MCcain. Unluckly he has little chance because of his advanced Age. Mr. MCcain operates in according to the liberal Principles, which are in no Contrast to the moderate Arabic Ambitions anyway.

01.01.2008

Two Days ago, Hilary Clinton was speaking about her Candidacy promising the US Citizens a democratic

Paradise. Like all other Democrats Lady Clinton Election campaign is based on a claimed G.W.Bush Failure in Iraq.

The dilemma of the Republicans is Silly US Voters accusing Bush of having betrayed them and not fulfilled his promises. They jump over the Fact that War State can not respond to Ambitions that are usually the State of Peace. Democrats did the same when the republicans went on War in Vietnam. They promised to do better. But as Johnson seized the presidency he increased the Number of deployed US Personals to 550000 Troop.

Hillary promised the Gays Hardcore rights.

Some comments:

1. she believes that the Facts under Bush have been based on Decisions and not the other Way around. Her Decisions (she affirm) will be based on Facts. But in the Case of the Gays, decisions be based on mere Disease.(think the Abolition Story and the white Democracy based on Facts of having Racist whites catching at Slavery)

Few days before, Mr. Bush said that Democrats try to gain merely Votes. In fact Democrats can do better concerning the War in Iraq or the War on Terror in general.

The Lady promised to make America lead the World. What is happening now is; America has been leading the World. In north Korea a splendid Success has been mastered by Mr. Hill, and the case of Iran seems to be a matter of US Decision also.

She promised to solve the problem of green house gas emissions and save the world from the melting Ice. In that respect, I promise that the environmental disaster will remain same thing under the Democrats. Even the red Chinese can do nothing about it. Four Ice Ages are already behind us. When the mamot extinguished in Europe, there was no Industry. In the Wuerm and other Ages there were no Industries also. The Scientists offer theories. From the German Prizewinner and English royal Friend Herr Koehler to the noble prize Winner Algore, all offer Analysis and dreadful prophecies, but no logical or effective Solutions. Exactly like the Democrats having been analyzing the War in Iraq, but merely words with no actions. It is true that the Scientists may do something about the global warming, but they may even make things worse. There is no guaranteed Solution. We may for sure believe in natural balanced Development. Our Future in the World is secured. Some might make Use of the UN Protocols preventing young Industries from developing. It is true that reduction of GHGE may reduce the CO² ,CO¹ etc. and it is possible to reduce the local air pollution, but there is no evidence about global Actions related to the stratosphere or the Icebergs threatening many Island across the World.

On the other Hand, Measures must be developed to detect each Country Activity quantitatively and qualitatively of Course. Which is practically impossible. Primarily we know that each Country care about the own Health, and the best engineer of its own Health.

Being Suspicious about what may be done to prevent the global Warming is no denial of the Fact that human Activities might be responsible. It is neither denial of the Possibility to stop GW nor a prove or justification, that proposed Plans may be efficient. It hsd been a Sciencific Methodology that Experiment is needed to prove the immunity of the Theory. In the Case of Algore Campaign there are no confident Proves or Experiments that have been made to ensure that the specified Emissions are main and decisive Cause. Think the human being produce methanol or Methane, which is one of the Ozone Hole Factors. But that can not be used in no way as material for Policy to act,While other bigger Issues are on the Table. The western European Countries have caused enough Harm, and after their Industries have developed they proposed Actions. Exactly the same did the nuclear Powers, proposing World Wide suppressions, but no Compensations have been paid.

The mentioned Facts are also no Justification of the Continual activities, but can not be in same way considered also as a reason to stop some industrial Projects.

Hillary propose further women participation and equality (that has been a republican Program as well, but with different demarcation of what women activities are).

What can be read behind is that lady Clinton want to say; stop pressuring Kings and dictators and work with them… I hope that my reading is wrong.

Lady Clinton with big Confidence and commitment to Israeli Rights, seem to have been suffering of psychological Shock caused by Bill and his women Affaires (think Lewinsky), and she decided to defeat him in her campaign.